When Two Logics Collide

iPhone/iPad: tap → Share → Books. Chromebook: downloads, then open with your reader.

Brands don’t usually fail because they contain opposites. Brands usually fail when the swing between opposite their opposing Energies grows too wide.

A brand oscillates. Markets change. Teams change. Pressure rises and falls. You move between logics as the system adapts.

The problem is amplitude.

When the swing widens, the system stops returning to centre. Interpretive Capacity can’t keep up. Activation Load rises, the public picture breaks, and internally, the work multiplies.

That’s when oscillation tips into failure modes:

Volatile: the system can’t keep its shape under its own motion.

Dormant: the system seizes, and nothing meaningful ships.

Every widening swing is a hidden tax on comprehension. You can feel that tax in the work:

Minutes of confusion (“What do you actually stand for?”)
Extra support tickets (“Why doesn’t this match what you said?”)
Diluted briefs (teams arguing about what story they’re telling)
More rework (creative revisions to patch strategic ambiguity)
More exceptions (terms, policies, and edge cases multiplying)

Case: WeWork (Visionary ↔ Pragmatist)
WeWork made Visionary behaviour physical: a neon “Never Settle” at the front desk became a house style of slogans and glowing signals. But the business underneath was Pragmatist: long leases, rent due on schedule, and short memberships that could vanish in a month. In its IPO filing it talked like a tech company, while commentators kept pointing out the numbers read like property, so interpretation split. Under pressure the swing widened: inspiration everywhere customers looked, constraint everywhere the balance sheet looked. In November 2023 it filed for Chapter 11, listing liabilities between $10B and $50B against about $15B in assets.

The goal is bounded swing, not elimination. That’s Tempered: proportion under motion.

Energy opposites (motivation)

Freedom ↔ Control

Freedom promises release, spontaneity, vivacity.
Control promises authority, precision, judgement.

You can move between them across zones. But if both Energies stay loud for too long, people can’t tell what governs the brand. The swing widens, and the tax shows up.

A Freedom brand can still be competent. It just can’t feel commanding. A Control brand can still be creative. It just can’t feel unbound.

Stabiliser move (toward Tempered):

Freedom expressed strongly → borrow Control: make one rule public, tighten standards, reduce the swing.
Control expressed strongly → borrow Freedom: loosen the posture, increase vitality, make the experience feel less like permission-seeking.

Practical test:
If you want people to feel permission, don’t talk like a referee. If you want people to feel certainty, don’t act like it’s a carnival.

Expansion ↔ Stability

Expansion promises movement with direction. The category changes direction and you lead it.
Stability promises reliability, belonging, “no surprises.”

You can phase between these Energies too. But if you broadcast both equally, customers don’t know what they’re buying into. Expansion needs visible change. Stability needs dependable sameness. The swing widens and trust can’t settle.

You can modernise a Stability brand, but in small steps.
You can mature an Expansion brand, but without turning it into a comfort blanket.

Stabiliser move (toward Tempered):

Expansion swinging too wide → borrow Stability: protect one asset, keep one promise fixed, slow the tempo.
Stability becoming dull → borrow Expansion: make one deliberate leap (not ten), then test it in public.

Practical test:
If your story is “we’re changing everything,” your service and product can’t feel “just like always.” If your story is “we’ll always be here,” your identity can’t keep reinventing itself.

Expression opposites (behaviour)

Expressions belong to Energies. You can say you’re one thing, but your Expression shows what’s actually leading.

Liberator ↔ Ruler

Liberator removes barriers: “you’re in charge.”
Ruler sets standards: “this is how it’s done.”

This pair is about permission vs constraint. When both speak at full volume, you get freedom claims wrapped in institutional behaviour, or authority claims delivered through “no rules”.

Stabiliser moves:

Liberator swinging toward Volatile → add a Ruler guardrail (fair terms, clear boundaries, “here’s what we won’t do”).
Ruler seizing up → add a Liberator release valve (remove one pointless step; give control somewhere real).

Test: if customers have to ask permission to feel free, the swing’s already wide.

Mover ↔ Sophisticate

Mover is immediacy. Momentum. Bursts.
Sophisticate is poise. Patience. Deliberate craft.

This pair is about tempo. You can run pulses of speed inside a poised brand, or moments of poise inside a fast brand. But if the clock keeps switching, the swing widens and nothing settles.

Stabiliser moves:

Mover swinging wide → borrow Sophisticate (fewer breakages, more finish, a slower clock).
Sophisticate becoming obsessive → borrow Mover (one pulse: a release, a deadline, a timely rule-break).

Test: if you can’t name the clock you live by, your customers can’t either.

Aesthete ↔ Navigator

Aesthete leads with beauty and sensation.
Navigator leads with clarity and guidance.

This pair is about sensation vs orientation. Aesthete answers “does it feel right?” Navigator answers “what’s the right choice?” You can make a Navigator beautiful. You can make an Aesthete useful. But one has to lead in any phase, or you start paying the comprehension tax.

Stabiliser moves:

Aesthete slipping into erratic → borrow Navigator (make the path obvious; say what it is; show the price).
Navigator hardening into instruction → borrow Aesthete (reduce words; let form carry reassurance).

Test: if the packaging is gorgeous, but it obscures the usage instruction, the swing’s already wide.

Advocate ↔ Caregiver

Advocate rallies. It demands action.
Caregiver protects. It reduces stress.

This pair is about arousal vs relief. A brand can support quietly in one phase and rally publicly in another. But if both postures are equally present at once, the audience can’t settle into a relationship.

Stabiliser moves:

Advocate swinging into stridency → borrow Caregiver (make participation feel safe; show protection in practice).
Caregiver fading into over-protective → borrow Advocate (one clear call; one public belief; one repeatable participation loop).

Test: if the customer thinks “I know. Let me do it”, you’ve crossed the line. Caregiver’s shadow is control dressed as care.

Breaker ↔ Familiar

Breaker ruptures. It unsettles.
Familiar reassures. It repeats.

This pair is about continuity. A Familiar can introduce a controlled break. A Breaker can stabilise around one repeated asset. But if rupture and reassurance are both loud, customers stop knowing what they’re standing on.

Stabiliser moves:

Breaker swinging wide → borrow Familiar (freeze one asset; repeat one format; make one part boring on purpose).
Familiar fading into irrelevance → borrow Breaker (one sharp interruption that proves you’re awake — then back to continuity).

Test: if every week is a reinvention, trust can’t compound.

Visionary ↔ Pragmatist

Visionary sells tomorrow.
Pragmatist solves today.

This pair is about distance. Visionary stretches. Pragmatist grounds. You can do both across phases. But if you ask for belief while insisting “we’re just practical” in the same breath, interpretation fragments.

Stabiliser moves:

Visionary slipping out of reach → borrow Pragmatist (one concrete step people can do today; proof over prophecy).
Pragmatist fading into invisibility → borrow Visionary (give usefulness a direction; make today’s fix part of a longer path).

Test: if the promise floats and the product thuds, trust snaps.

A fast way to use this (with Tempered as the goal)

Pick one pair and do a touchpoint sweep. You’re not hunting for a contradiction to eliminate. You’re measuring the amplitude. And whether the system can return.

Homepage: what promise does it make in the first 5 seconds?
Pricing + terms: what does it ask people to accept? Where does it feel strict or generous?
Customer service: what shows up under pressure? Fairness, care, authority, speed?
Advertising: what Energy is it amplifying? Does delivery match it?
Packaging / UX: what does it reward — speed, care, authority, beauty? What does it quietly punish?

Then ask two extra questions:

Are we collapsing towards Volatile (ungoverned signal) or Dormant (no signal)?
What small dose of the opposite would bring us back toward Tempered without changing who we are?

When the swing gets too wide, interpretation fragments and proportion fails . Either through overload (too much activation) or brittleness (too little). Keep the system able to return.